Skip to content

Religion and ethnicity at work: a study of British Muslim women's labour market performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-47
Number of pages29
JournalQuality and Quantity
Issue number1
Early online date7 Mar 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 1 Mar 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 7 Mar 2018
DatePublished (current) - 15 Jan 2019


The literature on British Muslim women’s labour market experience suffers from four lacunae: the inadequate analysis of the multi-layered facets of their identities and the disadvantages they face; the narrow range of labour market outcomes studied (primarily labour market participation and unemployment); a lack of recent studies on the integration of Muslim women, educated in the UK and with English as their first language, into the labour market; and the absence of material on several sub-groups due to the lack of data, notably Arab, Christian Indian and White-British Muslim women. Using a large sample of data from the 2011 British census, the analyses presented here suggest that most non-White women face significant labour market penalties, with religion having a greater impact on labour market outcomes than race/ethnicity; Muslim women were the most disadvantaged, compared to other religious minorities, more so in relation to unemployment levels, part-time jobs and out of employment history, than in relation to occupational class and over-qualification. The results also suggest that the penalties facing Muslim women shaped by their ethnicity; not all Muslim women were similarly disadvantaged.

    Research areas

  • Employment prospects, Ethnic penalty, Muslim women, Religious penalty, UK labour market

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Springer at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 583 KB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups