Skip to content

Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-192
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume6
Issue number2
Early online date18 Mar 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 16 Jan 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 18 Mar 2017
DatePublished (current) - Jun 2017

Abstract

People frequently rely on information even after it has been retracted, a phenomenon known as the continued-influence effect of misinformation. One factor proposed to explain the ineffectiveness of retractions is that repeating misinformation during a correction may inadvertently strengthen the misinformation by making it more familiar. Practitioners are therefore often encouraged to design corrections that avoid misinformation repetition. The current study tested this recommendation, investigating whether retractions become more or less effective when they include reminders or repetitions of the initial misinformation. Participants read fictional reports, some of which contained retractions of previous information, and inferential reasoning was measured via questionnaire. Retractions varied in the extent to which they served as misinformation reminders. Retractions that explicitly repeated the misinformation were more effective in reducing misinformation effects than retractions that avoided repetition, presumably because of enhanced salience. Recommendations for effective myth debunking may thus need to be revised.

    Research areas

  • Continued-influence effect, Misinformation, Myth debunking, Familiarity

    Structured keywords

  • Memory

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368116301838?via%3Dihub . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 407 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups