Abstract
This article addresses the claim that some contemporary states may possess obligations to pay reparations as a result of the lasting effects of colonialism. Claims about the harms and benefits caused by colonialism must make some kind of comparison between the world as it currently is, and a counterfactual state where the injustice which characterised so much of historic interaction between colonisers and the colonised did not occur. Rather than imagining a world a world where there was no interaction between such communities, this article maintains that the appropriate counterfactual state is one whereby relations between different communities took place in a context characterized by an absence of domination and exploitation. The conclusion is that there are good reasons to go beyond a focus on symbolic reparations and hold that many affluent contemporary states possess extensive but unfulfilled duties of rectificatory justice to some of the world’s poorest peoples.
| Translated title of the contribution | Repairing historical wrongs and the end of empire |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Article number | 242 |
| Pages (from-to) | 227 |
| Journal | Social and Legal Studies |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 23 Mar 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Repairing historical wrongs and the end of empire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver