Reparation for non-recent institutional child sexual abuse in England and Wales and Australia: A matter for private law or the State?

This article examines the question of reparation for non-recent institutional child sexual abuse in England and Australia in the light of independent inquiries which reported in 2022 (England and Wales) and 2017 (Australia). Both inquiries recommended the introduction of State-based redress schemes that would exist alongside private law. While the new UK government considers how to proceed, Australia has established a national redress scheme, there have been changes to private law and new legislation reforming tort law and removing procedural obstacles such as limitation. In evaluating the Australian reforms and the case for change in English law, this article examines the different roles State-based redress and private law compensation play in responding to the harm suffered by victims and survivors of sexual abuse. It argues that there are urgent lessons that the UK government should learn from the Australian experience in establishing a redress scheme and that while legislative change to substantive private law has not proven helpful in Australia, legislation on limitation periods and suing unincorporated associations has assisted claimants. Finally there are lessons that private law can learn from State-based redress schemes in seeking to provide remedies that meet the distinctive needs of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.