Reporting accountant appointments and accounting restatements: Evidence from UK private companies

Mark A Clatworthy, Michael Peel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

In recent years, regulators have exempted an increasing number of companies from the requirement to appoint auditors, yet little is known about the role of the accounting profession in preparing and validating the financial statements of unaudited companies. In this paper, we examine empirically the factors associated with the appointment of reporting accountants. We then provide novel evidence on whether unaudited UK small private companies are less likely to restate their annual accounts when they have been prepared by an external accountancy firm (i.e., a reporting accountant). Based on a cross sectional analysis of a large sample of small private unaudited UK companies, we find that, in accordance with the ‘confirmation hypothesis’, larger companies that voluntarily disclose more financial information are more likely to appoint a reporting accountant. We also find that the accounts of companies with a reporting accountant are significantly less likely to be restated than those without. This result is more pronounced for companies disclosing more financial information and for those employing a larger accounting firm. Given the dwindling number of private companies opting for audits, our findings contribute to debates on the role of the accounting profession in enhancing private company financial reporting quality.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100974
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Accounting Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting accountant appointments and accounting restatements: Evidence from UK private companies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this