Abstract
This paper is an examination of how research ethics committees have evolved from being advisory committees to more formal regulatory authorities. It is argued that the role of ethics committees should be broader than simple ethical review. Inconsistency in outcome should not be taken to signal failure. Procedural fairness is of the utmost importance. Nor should ethics committees be seen to diminish the ethical responsibilities of researchers themselves.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 695-700 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2008 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Centre for Health, Law and Society
Keywords
- Research Ethics Committees