Researching language attitudes based on historical data

Anna D. Havinga, Andreas Krogull

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter outlines how historical data can be used for research on language attitudes, concentrating on the field of historical sociolinguistics. It first discusses methodological challenges when working with historical data. Since historical (socio-)linguists cannot elicit data, they rely on the written and typically fragmented data available, which provide limited access to the attitudes of individuals. Furthermore, the boundaries between language attitudes and language ideologies are less sharply drawn in historical sociolinguistic research than in research on present-day data. Attitudes and ideologies are usually not addressed separately and often set in other linguistic contexts, such as language standardisation, linguistic purism, and prescriptivism. The second section of the chapter provides an overview of promising text sources that can be utilised to study language attitudes in the past, including normative texts, ego-documents, and statistical accounts, discussing both their potentials and drawbacks. The third section explains how these sources can be analysed, focussing on discourse-analytical and corpus-linguistic methods. To illustrate the main points made in this chapter, two case studies (one on German and one on Dutch) are presented. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of emerging trends in historical sociolinguistics, particularly the move towards studying language attitudes in multilingual settings.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Methods in Language Attitudes
EditorsRuth Kircher, Lena Zipp
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter19
Pages 297 - 312
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781108867788
ISBN (Print)9781108811668
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Researching language attitudes based on historical data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this