Resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored randomized clinical trials in Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a metaresearch study

MAking Randomized Trials Affordable (MARTA) Group, Alexandra Griessbach*, Benjamin Speich, Alain Amstutz, Lena Hausheer, Manuela Covino, Hillary Wnfried Ramirez, Stefan Schandelmaier, Ala Taji Heravi, Shaun Treweek, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Matthias Briel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives:
Conducting high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is challenging and resource intensive. Funders and academic investigators depend on limited financial resources and, therefore, need empirical data for optimal budget planning. However, current literature lacks detailed empirical data on resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored RCTs. The aim of this study is to systematically collect cost data from investigator-sponsored RCTs from Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods:
Principal investigators were asked to share their RCT cost and resource use data and enter it into an online case report form. We assessed cost patterns, cost drivers, and specific cost items, examined costs by study phase (planning-, conduct-, and finalization phase), compared planned with actual RCT costs, and explored differences in cost patterns across countries, medical fields, and intervention types.

Results:
We included 93 RCTs which were initiated in Switzerland (n = 53; including eight conducted in low- and lower middle-income countries), Germany (n = 22), and the UK (n = 18). The median total trial cost in our RCT sample was $645,824 [interquartile range (IQR), $269,846-$1,577,924]. The median proportion of the total costs spent for planning phase was 27.5% [IQR, 20.6%-39.7%], for conduct phase 57.3% [IQR, 44.4%-66.3%], and for finalization phase 12.7% [IQR, 8.5%-19.3%] with little variation across countries. The items that contributed most to the total costs were protocol writing (7.2%; IQR 3.8%-10.6%), data management (5.0%; IQR 2.2%-8.1%) and follow-up (4.5%; IQR 2.3%-8.4%). Of the 66 RCTs with an available original budget, 46 (69.7%) exceeded the budget by over 50%. Use of routinely collected data to assess primary outcomes was independently associated with lower per patient- and lower total trial costs.

Conclusion:
Over a quarter of total trial costs were incurred in the planning phase, which is typically not fully funded. Two-thirds of RCTs exceeded their budget by more than 50%. Investigators and funders should consider empirical cost data to improve budgeting and funding practices.
Original languageEnglish
Article number111536
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume176
Early online date21 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Germany
  • Switzerland
  • Humans
  • United Kingdom
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics
  • Research Personnel/economics
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Health Resources/economics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored randomized clinical trials in Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a metaresearch study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this