Abstract
This short response replies to critiques of my Annals article on decolonizing the Anthropocene (Jackson Citation2021). My response to my critical interlocutors locates differences in the politics of inclusion, plurality, and diversity between perspectives aligning themselves with decoloniality and earth systems governance. I argue that there are, in fact, constitutive differences between our respective positions. These do not preclude bridges to dialogue and understanding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e-vii-e-x |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Annals of the Association of American Geographers |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 29 Sept 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Groups and Themes
- Political Ecologies
- Historical and Cultural Geography
- Human Geography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Commentary: Probing the Politics of Plurality, Inclusion, and Diversity in the Earth System Governance Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver