Response to: 'Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial' by Handoll et al

Katharine Reeves, Samuel Chan, Alastair Marsh, Suzy Gallier, Catrin Wigley, Kamlesh Khunti, Richard J Lilford

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal) › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{033c2bd11d784f429662049bb6e0175e,

title = "Response to: 'Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial' by Handoll et al",

author = "Katharine Reeves and Samuel Chan and Alastair Marsh and Suzy Gallier and Catrin Wigley and Kamlesh Khunti and Lilford, {Richard J}",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010967",

language = "English",

journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",

issn = "2044-5415",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to: 'Concerns about the evidence in relation to implementation of the ProFHER trial' by Handoll et al

AU - Reeves, Katharine

AU - Chan, Samuel

AU - Marsh, Alastair

AU - Gallier, Suzy

AU - Wigley, Catrin

AU - Khunti, Kamlesh

AU - Lilford, Richard J

PY - 2020/2/18

Y1 - 2020/2/18

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010967

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010967

M3 - Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

C2 - 32071138

SN - 2044-5415

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

ER -