Response to Vanyukov: Why causality is a valid question for the gateway hypothesis

Zoe E Reed; Robyn E Wootton; Marcus R Munafò

doi:10.1111/add.15749

Response to Vanyukov: Why causality is a valid question for the gateway hypothesis

Zoe E Reed, Robyn E Wootton, Marcus R Munafò

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

Original language	English
Journal	Addiction
Early online date	17 Nov 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15749
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 17 Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by Public Health England, the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (Grant ref: MC_UU_00011/7), and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. R.E.W. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the South‐Eastern Regional Health Authority (2020024).

Access to Document

10.1111/add.15749

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{fac3450f7f6e4c53ac636af973e83201,

title = "Response to Vanyukov: Why causality is a valid question for the gateway hypothesis",

author = "Reed, {Zoe E} and Wootton, {Robyn E} and Munaf{\`o}, {Marcus R}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported in part by Public Health England, the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (Grant ref: MC_UU_00011/7), and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. R.E.W. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the South‐Eastern Regional Health Authority (2020024). ",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

day = "17",

doi = "10.1111/add.15749",

language = "English",

journal = "Addiction",

issn = "0965-2140",

publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Vanyukov

T2 - Why causality is a valid question for the gateway hypothesis

AU - Reed, Zoe E

AU - Wootton, Robyn E

AU - Munafò, Marcus R

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported in part by Public Health England, the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (Grant ref: MC_UU_00011/7), and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. R.E.W. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the South‐Eastern Regional Health Authority (2020024).

PY - 2021/11/17

Y1 - 2021/11/17

U2 - 10.1111/add.15749

DO - 10.1111/add.15749

M3 - Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

C2 - 34791743

SN - 0965-2140

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

ER -