Responses of mink to auditory stimuli: Prerequisites for applying the ‘cognitive bias’ approach

Pernille Svendsen, Jens Malmkvist, Ulrich Halekoh, Michael T Mendl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine and validate prerequisites for applying a cognitive (judgement)
bias approach to assessing welfare in farmed mink (Neovison vison). We investigated discrimination
ability and associative learning ability using auditory cues. The mink (n = 15 females) were divided into
two groups (High, n = 8; Low, n = 7, representing the frequency of the tone they were habituated to, 18
and 2 kHz respectively) and were tested using a habituation–dishabituation procedure in experiment 1.
In experiment 2 one auditory stimulus was followed by an inter-trial-interval (safe/neutral situation),
whereas another auditory stimulus was followed by an aversive stimulus (air blow) before the intertrial-
interval (danger situation). We observed behaviour including latencies to show a response during
both experiments. The High mink showed significant habituation in experiment 1 but the Low mink only
showed habituation in experiment 2. Regardless of the frequency used (2 and 18 kHz), cues predicting
the danger situation initially elicited slower responses compared to those predicting the safe situation
but quickly became faster. Using auditory cues as discrimination stimuli for female farmed mink in a
judgement bias approach would thus appear to be feasible. However several specific issues are to be
considered in order to successfully adapt a cognitive bias approach to mink, and these are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBehavioural Processes
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2012

Keywords

  • American mink
  • Associative learning
  • Auditory discrimination
  • Cognitive bias

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Responses of mink to auditory stimuli: Prerequisites for applying the ‘cognitive bias’ approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this