Restriction of access to means used for suicide

Keith Hawton*, Duleeka Knipe, Jane Pirkis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

One of the most effective public health measures to prevent suicide is the restriction of access to means used in suicidal acts. This approach can be especially effective if a method is common and readily accessible. Suicide methods vary widely, and there have been several examples where means restriction has been applied, often with considerable success. Factors contributing to availability of suicide methods can include access to physical means as well as cognitive awareness of methods. In this paper, which is the second in a Series on a public health approach to suicide prevention, we focus primarily on examples of restricting access to physical means of suicide, such as pesticides, firearms, and medication. We also discuss restricting the cognitive availability of means through attention to media and other representations of suicide methods. There are challenges associated with restricting access to means, including resistance to measures required to change the availability of some methods (which might, in part, be commercially determined) and method substitution, whereby one suicide method is replaced by another. Nevertheless, means restriction must be an integral part of all national and local suicide prevention strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere796-e801
JournalLancet Public Health
Volume9
Issue number10
Early online date9 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restriction of access to means used for suicide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this