Skip to content

Rethinking the competing discourses on uncorroborated allegations of child sexual abuse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

Original languageEnglish
Article numberazy037
Pages (from-to)461-480
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
Issue number2
Early online date26 Sep 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 10 Aug 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 26 Sep 2018
DatePublished (current) - Mar 2019


This article shows that the competing discourses on uncorroborated allegations of child sexual abuse (UACSA) each rests on unreliable epistemic assumptions, meaning that in any given case it is uncertain whether the individual making the accusation is a genuine victim or the perpetrator of a false allegation against an innocent individual. It argues that this presents a fatal challenge to the existing fields of knowledge and practise on either side of the discursive divide in terms of how alleged victims in UACSA cases are conceptualized and measured and how they are acted upon. It concludes with a call for an open-minded approach, which prioritizes the pursuit of truth in investigations to try to ensure that criminal justice system interventions in such an inherently problematic area are just and that they do not cause or compound the forms of harm and injustice currently at play.

    Research areas

  • Allegations of child sexual abuse; false allegations; discourse; victims; harm., false allegations, discourse, victims, harm



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Oxford University Press at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 270 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 26/09/20

    Request copy


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups