TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking the nation and international relations
T2 - The space of nation states
AU - Schmitz, Andreas
AU - Atkinson, Will
AU - Lebaron, Frederic
N1 - Funding Information:
We are thankful for valuable debates with Daniel Witte, Christian Schneickert, Jörg Blasius, Jonas Volle, and Khulan Bayarkhuu as well as for the constructive feedback from the reviewers. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.
PY - 2023/9/4
Y1 - 2023/9/4
N2 - Efforts to move sociology beyond the nation state and international relations theory have both been plagued by several limitations and dualisms. Recent research has begun to find ways beyond the problems by turning to Pierre Bourdieu’s relational conception of social structure and practice. Yet one specific relational structure forming a key part of the puzzle has been neglected or merely implicitly assumed so far: the space of nation states. After clarifying the structural-constructivist nature of this concept, we aim to specify it by constructing an empirical model of the contemporary space of nation states using a specially compiled dataset and tools of geometric data analysis. The analysis reveals the distribution of powers on the world scene, and more specifically, the uneven possession of two varieties of ‘meta-capital’ understood as capacities to regulate the value and exchangeability of certain capitals and to decree what even defines a legitimate ‘state’. We argue that the nation state, which is accurately understood as a contingent construct and well-founded fiction from a Bourdieusian viewpoint, should not be excluded when analysing the expression and reproduction of contemporary global power relations.
AB - Efforts to move sociology beyond the nation state and international relations theory have both been plagued by several limitations and dualisms. Recent research has begun to find ways beyond the problems by turning to Pierre Bourdieu’s relational conception of social structure and practice. Yet one specific relational structure forming a key part of the puzzle has been neglected or merely implicitly assumed so far: the space of nation states. After clarifying the structural-constructivist nature of this concept, we aim to specify it by constructing an empirical model of the contemporary space of nation states using a specially compiled dataset and tools of geometric data analysis. The analysis reveals the distribution of powers on the world scene, and more specifically, the uneven possession of two varieties of ‘meta-capital’ understood as capacities to regulate the value and exchangeability of certain capitals and to decree what even defines a legitimate ‘state’. We argue that the nation state, which is accurately understood as a contingent construct and well-founded fiction from a Bourdieusian viewpoint, should not be excluded when analysing the expression and reproduction of contemporary global power relations.
U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.13019
DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.13019
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 37165948
SN - 0007-1315
VL - 74
SP - 673
EP - 689
JO - British Journal of Sociology
JF - British Journal of Sociology
IS - 4
ER -