Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope

Nathalie Percie du Sert; Viki Hurst; Amrita Ahluwalia; Sabina Alam; Douglas G Altman; Marc T Avey; Monya Baker; William J Browne; Alejandra Clark; Innes C Cuthill; Ulrich Dirnagl; Michael Emerson; Paul Garner; David W Howells; Natasha A. Karp; Catriona J  MacCallum; Malcolm Macleod; Ole Petersen; Frances Rawle; Penny Reynolds; Kieron  Rooney; Emily S Sena; Shai D Silberberg; Thomas Steckler; Hanno Würbel; Stephen T. Holgate

doi:10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope

Nathalie Percie du Sert, Viki Hurst, Amrita Ahluwalia, Sabina Alam, Douglas G Altman, Marc T Avey, Monya Baker, William J Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C Cuthill, Ulrich Dirnagl, Michael Emerson, Paul Garner, David W Howells, Natasha A. Karp, Catriona J MacCallum, Malcolm Macleod, Ole Petersen, Frances Rawle, Penny ReynoldsKieron Rooney, Emily S Sena, Shai D Silberberg, Thomas Steckler, Hanno Würbel, Stephen T. Holgate

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

165 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research:
Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines
to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite
considerable levels of support from the scientific community,
the impact on the quality of reporting in animal research
publications has been limited. This position paper highlights
the strategy of an expert working group established to
revise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group’s
initial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisation
of the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development of
an explanation and elaboration document, and revision of
specific items.

Original language	English
Article number	e000002
Number of pages	4
Journal	BMJ Open Science
Volume	2
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002
Publication status	Published - 12 Jun 2018

Bibliographical note

Provisional acceptance date added, based on publication date.

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BMJ at https://openscience.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000002. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Final published version, 517 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Altman, D. G., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., Petersen, O., Rawle, F., ... Holgate, S. T. (2018). Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope. BMJ Open Science, 2(1), Article e000002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

@article{a4c1294a451e4ad0a29353d619e60a5b,

title = "Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope",

abstract = "In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research:Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelinesto improve the reporting of animal research. Despiteconsiderable levels of support from the scientific community,the impact on the quality of reporting in animal researchpublications has been limited. This position paper highlightsthe strategy of an expert working group established torevise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group{\textquoteright}sinitial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisationof the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development ofan explanation and elaboration document, and revision ofspecific items.",

author = "{Percie du Sert}, Nathalie and Viki Hurst and Amrita Ahluwalia and Sabina Alam and Altman, {Douglas G} and Avey, {Marc T} and Monya Baker and Browne, {William J} and Alejandra Clark and Cuthill, {Innes C} and Ulrich Dirnagl and Michael Emerson and Paul Garner and Howells, {David W} and Karp, {Natasha A.} and MacCallum, {Catriona J} and Malcolm Macleod and Ole Petersen and Frances Rawle and Penny Reynolds and Kieron Rooney and Sena, {Emily S} and Silberberg, {Shai D} and Thomas Steckler and Hanno W{\"u}rbel and Holgate, {Stephen T.}",

note = "Provisional acceptance date added, based on publication date. ",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

journal = "BMJ Open Science",

issn = "2398-8703",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

Percie du Sert, N, Hurst, V, Ahluwalia, A, Alam, S, Altman, DG, Avey, MT, Baker, M, Browne, WJ, Clark, A, Cuthill, IC, Dirnagl, U, Emerson, M, Garner, P, Howells, DW, Karp, NA, MacCallum, CJ, Macleod, M, Petersen, O, Rawle, F, Reynolds, P, Rooney, K, Sena, ES, Silberberg, SD, Steckler, T, Würbel, H & Holgate, ST 2018, 'Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope', BMJ Open Science, vol. 2, no. 1, e000002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines

T2 - rationale and scope

AU - Percie du Sert, Nathalie

AU - Hurst, Viki

AU - Ahluwalia, Amrita

AU - Alam, Sabina

AU - Altman, Douglas G

AU - Avey, Marc T

AU - Baker, Monya

AU - Browne, William J

AU - Clark, Alejandra

AU - Cuthill, Innes C

AU - Dirnagl, Ulrich

AU - Emerson, Michael

AU - Garner, Paul

AU - Howells, David W

AU - Karp, Natasha A.

AU - MacCallum, Catriona J

AU - Macleod, Malcolm

AU - Petersen, Ole

AU - Rawle, Frances

AU - Reynolds, Penny

AU - Rooney, Kieron

AU - Sena, Emily S

AU - Silberberg, Shai D

AU - Steckler, Thomas

AU - Würbel, Hanno

AU - Holgate, Stephen T.

N1 - Provisional acceptance date added, based on publication date.

PY - 2018/6/12

Y1 - 2018/6/12

N2 - In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research:Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelinesto improve the reporting of animal research. Despiteconsiderable levels of support from the scientific community,the impact on the quality of reporting in animal researchpublications has been limited. This position paper highlightsthe strategy of an expert working group established torevise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group’sinitial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisationof the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development ofan explanation and elaboration document, and revision ofspecific items.

AB - In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research:Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelinesto improve the reporting of animal research. Despiteconsiderable levels of support from the scientific community,the impact on the quality of reporting in animal researchpublications has been limited. This position paper highlightsthe strategy of an expert working group established torevise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group’sinitial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisationof the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development ofan explanation and elaboration document, and revision ofspecific items.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

DO - 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 33954268

SN - 2398-8703

VL - 2

JO - BMJ Open Science

JF - BMJ Open Science

IS - 1

M1 - e000002

ER -

Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: rationale and scope

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this