Abstract
In this article, we articulate and defend a contextual approach to political theory. According to what we shall call ‘iterative contextualism’, context has two important roles to play in determining what is required by justice. First, it is through the exploration and evaluation of multiple contexts that general principles are devised, revised and refined. Second, significant weight should be given to the norms to be found in specific contexts because the people affected by those norms strongly identify with them. Having said this, the application of general principles to particular contexts may still result in recommendations which deviate to some degree from the prevailing norms. In this case, we shall argue that although justice requires something other than what local norms say, what is required is likely to be intimated by the relevant context. Thus, whilst considerations of identification act as significant constraints on iterative contextualists’ thinking, the idea of intimations provides them with an important resource.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 339-357 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Res Publica |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Aug 2018 |
Research Groups and Themes
- SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship
Keywords
- Context
- Hate speech
- Norms
- Oakeshott
- Principles
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting Contextualism in Political Theory: Putting Principles into Context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Tariq Modood
- School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies - Professor of Sociology, Politics and Public Policy
- Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship
Person: Academic , Group lead