Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Revisiting the Association of ABO Blood Groups Alongside Vaccination With Patient Outcomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 Respiratory Infection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Bristol, UK 2020–2023

Alice Hathaway, George Qian, Jade King, Serena McGuinness, Nick Maskell, Jennifer Oliver, Adam Finn, Leon Danon, Robert Challen, Ashley M. Toye*, Catherine Hyams*, Amelia Langdon, Amy Taylor, Anabella Turner, Anya Mattocks, Charli Grimes, David Adegbite, Emma Bridgeman, Francesca Bayley, Grace TilzeyJane Kinney, Johanna Kellett Wright, Leah Fleming, Maria Garcia Gonzalez, Pip Croxford, Rajeka Lazarus, Robin Marlow, Robyn Heath, Rupert Antico, Tawassal Riaz, The Avon CAP Research Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background:
The 2023 SARS-CoV-2 environment differs greatly from the initial outbreak, with new variants and widespread vaccination. Early in the pandemic, blood group A was linked to increased hospitalisation and poor outcomes, but its role now, since the availability of vaccination, is unclear.

Methods:
We analysed data (1 August 2020–31 July 2023) from a prospective cohort of adults hospitalised in Bristol with SARS-CoV-2 and known ABO group (n = 3413). Admission date acted as a proxy for viral strain. Regression models assessed length of stay, survival, cardiovascular complications and ICU admission in non-O groups versus Group O.

Results:
Group A was over-represented and Group O was under-represented, compared to the blood donor population, except during Alpha dominance (p < 0.001; Alpha: p = 0.796). ABO group generally did not affect cardiovascular risk. However, during Wild-Type, Group AB had higher odds of cardiovascular complications (odds ratio [OR] = 3.18, p = 0.060) and intensive care unit [ICU] admission (OR = 4.79, p = 0.013). During Omicron, AB group patients had lower 30-day survival (HR = 2.09, p = 0.018). Group A was less likely to be discharged during Alpha (HR = 0.85, p = 0.013), while Group B was more likely to be discharged during Omicron (HR = 1.30, p = 0.002).

Conclusions:
ABO groups may still influence hospitalisation risk but appear less relevant to outcomes once admitted, likely reflecting advances in care and vaccination.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70264
Number of pages12
JournaleJHaem
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date16 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • respiratory infection
  • blood group
  • ABO
  • COVID‐19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the Association of ABO Blood Groups Alongside Vaccination With Patient Outcomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 Respiratory Infection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Bristol, UK 2020–2023'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this