Abstract
In group management, accurate assessment of individual performance is crucial for the fair allocation of resources such as bonuses. This paper explores the complexities of gauging each participant’s contribution in multi-participant projects, particularly through the lens of self-reporting—a method fraught with the challenges of under-reporting and over-reporting, which can skew resource allocation and undermine fairness. Addressing the limitations of current assessment methods, which often rely solely on self-reported data, this study proposes a novel equitable allocation policy that accounts for inherent biases in self-reporting. By developing a data-driven mathematical optimization model, we aim to more accurately align resource allocation with actual contributions, thus enhancing team efficiency and cohesion. Our computational experiments validate the proposed model’s effectiveness in achieving a more equitable allocation of resources, suggesting significant implications for management practices in team settings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2095 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Mathematics |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 13 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 by the authors.
Keywords
- data-driven optimization
- equitable resource allocation
- performance assessment