Role of information in preparing men for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A qualitative study embedded in the ProtecT trial

Julia Wade*, Derek J. Rosario, Joanne Howson, Kerry N L Avery, C Elizabeth Salter, M. Louise Goodwin, Jane M. Blazeby, J. Athene Lane, Chris Metcalfe, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny L. Donovan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
281 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The histological diagnosis of prostate cancer requires a prostate needle biopsy. Little is known about the relationship between information provided to prepare men for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx) and how men experience biopsy. The objectives were a) to understand men's experiences of biopsy as compared to their expectations; and b) to propose current evidence-based information for men undergoing TRUS-Bx. Methods: Between February 2006 and May 2008, 1,147 men undergoing a standardised 10-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy protocol under antibiotic cover following a PSA 3.0-19.9 ng/ml in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial, completed questionnaires about biopsy symptoms. In this embedded qualitative study, in-depth interviews were undertaken with 85 men (mean age 63.6 yrs, mean PSA 4.5 ng/ml) to explore men's experiences of prostate biopsy and how the experience might be improved. Interview data were analysed thematically using qualitative research methods. Findings from the qualitative study were used to guide selection of key findings from the questionnaire study in developing a patient information leaflet preparing men for biopsy. Results: Although most men tolerated TRUS-Bx, a quarter reported problematic side-effects and anxiety. Side effects were perceived as problematic and anxiety arose most commonly when experiences deviated from information provided. Men who were unprepared for elements of TRUS-Bx procedure or its sequelae responded by contacting health professionals for reassurance and voiced frustration that pre-biopsy information had understated the possible severity or duration of pain/discomfort and bleeding. Findings from questionnaire and interview data were combined to propose a comprehensive, evidence-based patient information leaflet for TRUS-Bx. Conclusions: Men reported anxiety associated with TRUS-Bx or its side-effects most commonly if they felt inadequately prepared for the procedure. Data from this qualitative study and the previous questionnaire study have been used to propose an updated, comprehensive evidence-based set of information for men undergoing TRUS-Bx.

Original languageEnglish
Article number80
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2015

Structured keywords

  • ConDuCT-II
  • Centre for Surgical Research
  • BTC (Bristol Trials Centre)

Keywords

  • Biopsy
  • Cancer
  • Patient information
  • Prostate
  • Qualitative methods

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Role of information in preparing men for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A qualitative study embedded in the ProtecT trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this