Safety and immunogenicity of a variant-adapted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant as a booster in adults primed with authorized vaccines: a phase 3, parallel-group study

Guy de Bruyn*, Joyce Wang, Annie Purvis, Martin Sanchez Ruiz, Haritha Adhikarla, Saad Alvi, Matthew I Bonaparte, Daniel Brune, Agustin Bueso, Richard M Canter, Maria Angeles Ceregido, Sachin Deschmukh, David Diemert, Adam H R Finn, Remi Forrat, Bo Fu, Julie Gallais, Paul Griffin, marie-Helene Grillet, Owen HaneyJeffery A Henderson, Marguerite Koutsoukos, Odile Launay, Federico Martinon Torres, Roger Masotti, Nelson L Michael, Juliana Park, Doris Maribel Rivera-Medina, Natalya Romanayak, Chris Rook, Lode Schuerman, Lawrence D Sher, Fernanda Tavares-Da-Silva, Ashley Whittington, Roman M Chicz, Sanjay Gurunathan, Stephen Savarino, Saranya Sridhar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
In a parallel-group, international, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04762680), we evaluated prototype (D614) and Beta (B.1.351) variant recombinant spike protein booster vaccines with AS03-adjuvant (CoV2 preS dTM-AS03).
Methods
Adults, previously primed with mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273), adenovirus-vectored (Ad26.CoV2.S, ChAdOx1nCoV-19) or protein (CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 [monovalent D614; MV(D614)]) vaccines were enrolled between 29 July 2021 and 22 February 2022. Participants were stratified by age (18–55 and ≥ 56 years) and received one of the following CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 booster formulations: MV(D614) (n = 1285), MV(B.1.351) (n = 707) or bivalent D614 + B.1.351 (BiV; n = 625). Unvaccinated adults who tested negative on a SARS-CoV-2 rapid diagnostic test (control group, n = 479) received two primary doses, 21 days apart, of MV(D614). Anti-D614G and anti-B.1.351 antibodies were evaluated using validated pseudovirus (lentivirus) neutralization (PsVN) assay 14 days post-booster (day [D]15) in 18–55-year-old BNT162b2-primed participants and compared with those pre-booster (D1) and on D36 in 18–55-year-old controls (primary immunogenicity endpoints). PsVN titers to Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/5 subvariants were also evaluated. Safety was evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period. Planned interim analyses are presented up to 14 days post-last vaccination for immunogenicity and over a median duration of 5 months for safety.
Findings
All three boosters elicited robust anti-D614G or -B.1.351 PsVN responses for mRNA, adenovirus-vectored and protein vaccine-primed groups. Among BNT162b2-primed adults (18–55 years), geometric means of the individual post-booster versus pre-booster titer ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) were: for MV (D614), 23.37 (18.58–29.38) (anti-D614G); for MV(B.1.351), 35.41 (26.71–46.95) (anti-B.1.351); and for BiV, 14.39 (11.39–18.28) (anti-D614G) and 34.18 (25.84–45.22 (anti-B.1.351). GMT ratios (98.3% CI) versus post-primary vaccination GMTs in controls, were: for MV(D614) booster, 2.16 (1.69; 2.75) [anti-D614G]; for MV(B.1.351), 1.96 (1.54; 2.50) [anti-B.1.351]; and for BiV, 2.34 (1.84; 2.96) [anti-D614G] and 1.39 (1.09; 1.77) [anti-B.1.351]. All booster formulations elicited cross-neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.2 (across priming vaccine subgroups), Omicron BA.1 (BNT162b2-primed participants) and Omicron BA.4/5 (BNT162b2-primed participants and MV D614-primed participants). Similar patterns in antibody responses were observed for participants aged ≥56 years. Reactogenicity tended to be transient and mild-to-moderate severity in all booster groups. No safety concerns were identified.
Interpretation
CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 boosters demonstrated acceptable safety and elicited robust neutralizing antibodies against multiple variants, regardless of priming vaccine.
Funding
Sanofi and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
Original languageEnglish
Article number102109
JournalEClinicalMedicine
Volume62
Issue number102109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Sanofi and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).The authors thank all participants, investigators, and study site personnel who took part in this study. The authors acknowledge Juliette Gray of inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare Ltd, London, UK, for providing editorial assistance with the preparation of this manuscript, funded by Sanofi. The authors also thank Hanson Geevarghese for providing manuscript coordination on behalf of Sanofi. This work was done in collaboration with GSK, who provided access to, and use of, the AS03 Adjuvant System.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and immunogenicity of a variant-adapted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant as a booster in adults primed with authorized vaccines: a phase 3, parallel-group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this