Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part I. Uncertainty and unabated emissions

Stephan Lewandowsky*, James S. Risbey, Michael Smithson, Ben R. Newell, John Hunter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)


Uncertainty forms an integral part of climate science, and it is often used to argue against mitigative action. This article presents an analysis of uncertainty in climate sensitivity that is robust to a range of assumptions. We show that increasing uncertainty is necessarily associated with greater expected damages from warming, provided the function relating warming to damages is convex. This constraint is unaffected by subjective or cultural risk-perception factors, it is unlikely to be overcome by the discount rate, and it is independent of the presumed magnitude of climate sensitivity. The analysis also extends to "second-order" uncertainty; that is, situations in which experts disagree. Greater disagreement among experts increases the likelihood that the risk of exceeding a global temperature threshold is greater. Likewise, increasing uncertainty requires increasingly greater protective measures against sea level rise. This constraint derives directly from the statistical properties of extreme values. We conclude that any appeal to uncertainty compels a stronger, rather than weaker, concern about unabated warming than in the absence of uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-37
Number of pages17
JournalClimatic Change
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Structured keywords

  • Memory


  • decision making
  • unabated emissions
  • Uncertainty

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part I. Uncertainty and unabated emissions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this