TY - JOUR
T1 - Scoping Potential Routes to UK Civil Unrest via the Food System: Results of a Structured Expert Elicitation
AU - Royal Society APEX food system team
AU - Jones, Aled
AU - Bridle, Sarah
AU - Denby, Katherine
AU - Bhunnoo, Riaz
AU - Morton, R. D
AU - Stanbrough, Lucy
AU - Coupe, Barnaby
AU - Pilley, Vanessa
AU - Benton, Tim
AU - Falloon, Pete
AU - Matthews, Tom K.
AU - Hasnain, Saher
AU - Heslop-Harrison, John S.
AU - Beard, S. J.
AU - Pierce, Julie
AU - Pretty, Jules
AU - Zurek, Monika
AU - Johnstone, Alexandra
AU - Smith, Pete
AU - Gunn, Neil
AU - Watson, Molly
AU - Pope, Edward
AU - Tzachor, Asaf
AU - Douglas, Caitlin
AU - Reynolds, Christian John
AU - Ward, Neil
AU - Fredenburgh, Jez
AU - Pettinger, Clare
AU - Quested, Tom
AU - Brown, Christopher
PY - 2023/10/12
Y1 - 2023/10/12
N2 - We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (over 80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning
AB - We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (over 80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su152014783
U2 - 10.3390/su152014783
DO - 10.3390/su152014783
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
SN - 2071-1050
JO - Sustainability
JF - Sustainability
ER -