Skip to content

Secrecy’s subjects: special operators in the US Shadow War

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of International Security
DateAccepted/In press - 2019


This article sets out a framework for studying the power of secrecy in security discourses. To date, the interplay between secrecy and security has been explored within security studies most often through a framing of secrecy and security as a ‘balancing act’, where secrecy and revelation are binary opposites, and excesses of either produce insecurity. Increasingly, however, the co-constitutive relationship between secrecy and security is the subject of scholarly explorations. Drawing on ‘secrecy studies’, using the US ‘shadow war’ as an empirical case study, and conducting a close reading of a set of key memoirs associated with the rising practice of ‘manhunting’ in the Global War on Terrorism (GWoT), this article makes the case that to understand the complex workings of power within a security discourse, the political work of secrecy as a multi-layered composition of practices (geospatial, technical, cultural and spectacular) needs to be analysed. In particular, these layers result in the production and centering of several secrecy subjects that help to reproduce the logic of the GWoT and the hierarchies of gender, race and sex within and beyond special operator communities (‘insider’, ‘stealthy’, ‘quiet’, and ‘alluring’ subjects) as essential to the security discourse of the US ‘shadow war’.

    Research areas

  • secrecy, Global War on Terrorism, shadow war, gender, race and sex, memoirs



  • Full-text PDF (author’s accepted manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 5 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups