Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial number of patients present with a suspected ACS and non-obstructive coronary arteries; sex differences in these patients are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the impact of sex on clinical presentation and outcome in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-obstructive coronary arteries with a final diagnosis confirmed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).
METHODS: Consecutive patients with ACS and non-obstructive coronary arteries (n = 719) with an unclear cause from a single tertiary centre who were referred for CMR were included. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: CMR was performed at a median time of 30 days after presentation and identified a diagnosis in 74% of patients. All-cause mortality was 9.5% over a median follow up of 4.9 years, with no significant difference between sexes (8.8% versus 10.1%; p = 0.456). Men were more likely to have non-ischaemic aetiology on CMR than women (55% v 41%, p < 0.001), but were equally likely to have an ischaemic cause (25% v 27%, p = 0.462). Age group (HR 1.58, p < 0.001) and LV ejection fraction (HR 0.98, p = 0.023) were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in all-cause mortality between sexes in patients presenting with suspected ACS and non-obstructive coronary arteries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 15-22 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Cardiology |
Volume | 372 |
Early online date | 24 Nov 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24 Nov 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The study was kindly supported by grants from the Rosetrees Trust , James Tudor Foundation and Above and Beyond Charitable Trust . In addition, CBD was in part supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol (2010−2021). SP is funded by a British Heart Foundation Chair ( CH/16/2/32089 ). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.