Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies

Richard J. Adams*, Palie Smart, Anne Sigismund Huff

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

167 Citations (Scopus)
1151 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper suggests how the 'grey literature', the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer-review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and organization studies (MOS). The authors clarify the possibilities by reviewing 140 systematic reviews published in academic and practitioner outlets to answer the following three questions: (i) Why is grey literature excluded from/included in systematic reviews in MOS? (ii) What types of grey material have been included in systematic reviews since guidelines for practice were first established in this discipline? (iii) How is the grey literature treated currently to advance management and organization scholarship and knowledge? This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence-based management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-454
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume19
Issue number4
Early online date19 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this