Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shakespeare’s violence and the use of content warnings in UK secondary schools: What do students think?

Rebecca Yearling*, Claire L Fox

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

The use of content warnings in English literature education, particularly for canonical texts such as the plays of Shakespeare, has sparked debate, yet little is known about how secondary-school-aged students themselves feel about them. This study addresses this gap by surveying 310 students from four English schools and sixth-form colleges and conducting focus groups with 39 sixth form students. Findings showed that few students had encountered content warnings when studying Shakespeare, and opinions were divided on their value. While many viewed Shakespeare’s violence as integral to the plot or dismissed it as fictional, others found it potentially distressing. The focus group discussions supported the need for content warnings, emphasising their role in fostering a supportive learning environment and suggesting practical implementation strategies. The study highlights the importance of balancing educators’ responsibility with student wellbeing and integrating personal, social, and health education across the curriculum.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-498
Number of pages16
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Volume55
Issue number4
Early online date12 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shakespeare’s violence and the use of content warnings in UK secondary schools: What do students think?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this