Skip to content

Shipbuilding Docks as Experimental Systems for Realistic Assessments of Anthropogenic Stressors on Marine Organisms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Rick Bruintjes
  • Harry Harding
  • Tom Bunce
  • Fiona Birch
  • Jessica Lister
  • Ilaria Spiga
  • Tom Benson
  • Kate Rossington
  • Diane Jones
  • Charles Tyler
  • Andy Radford
  • Steve Simpson
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-859
Number of pages7
Issue number9
Early online date1 Sep 2017
DateAccepted/In press - 25 Jun 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Sep 2017
DatePublished (current) - Sep 2017


Empirical investigations of the impacts of anthropogenic stressors on marine organisms are typically performed under controlled laboratory conditions, onshore mesocosms, or via offshore experiments with realistic (but uncontrolled) environmental variation. These approaches have merits, but onshore setups are generally small-sized and fail to recreate natural stressor-fields, whilst offshore studies are often compromised by confounding factors. We suggest the use of flooded shipbuilding docks to allow studying realistic exposure to stressors and their impacts on intra and interspecific responses of animals. Shipbuilding docks permit careful study of groups of known animals, including evaluation of their behavioral interactions, while enabling full control of the stressor and many environmental conditions. We propose that this approach could be used for assessing impacts of prominent anthropogenic stressors, including chemicals, ocean warming and sound. Results from shipbuilding-dock studies could allow improved parameterization of predictive models relating to environmental risks and population consequences of anthropogenic stressors.

    Research areas

  • concept, ecosystem impacts, marine species, pollutant

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Oxford University Press at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 275 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups