TY - JOUR
T1 - Short versus extended progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh IVF cycles
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Watters, Marianne
AU - Noble, Matt
AU - Child, Tim
AU - Nelson, Scott
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - This review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effect of prolonged progesterone support on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two independent authors searched Embase, MEDLINE and grey literature from inception to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of prolonged progesterone support versus early cessation. Risk of bias was assessed. Outcome measures were live birth, miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy rate. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018088605). Seven trials involving 1627 participants were included: three reported live birth rate (672/830), seven the miscarriage rate (178/1627) and seven the ongoing pregnancy rate (1351/1627). Clinical outcomes were similar between early progesterone cessation versus progesterone continuation: live birth rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.00), miscarriage rate (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69–1.20) and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates were similar when analyses were restricted to those with cessation of progesterone on the day of a positive human chorionic gonadotrophin (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.06). This meta-analysis suggests that prolonged progesterone support may be unnecessary after fresh embryo transfer. Further larger RCT would be useful to corroborate and lead to standardized duration of progesterone luteal phase support across IVF/ICSI centres.
AB - This review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effect of prolonged progesterone support on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two independent authors searched Embase, MEDLINE and grey literature from inception to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of prolonged progesterone support versus early cessation. Risk of bias was assessed. Outcome measures were live birth, miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy rate. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018088605). Seven trials involving 1627 participants were included: three reported live birth rate (672/830), seven the miscarriage rate (178/1627) and seven the ongoing pregnancy rate (1351/1627). Clinical outcomes were similar between early progesterone cessation versus progesterone continuation: live birth rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.00), miscarriage rate (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69–1.20) and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates were similar when analyses were restricted to those with cessation of progesterone on the day of a positive human chorionic gonadotrophin (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.06). This meta-analysis suggests that prolonged progesterone support may be unnecessary after fresh embryo transfer. Further larger RCT would be useful to corroborate and lead to standardized duration of progesterone luteal phase support across IVF/ICSI centres.
KW - IVF
KW - Live birth rate
KW - Luteal phase
KW - Miscarriage rate
KW - Ongoing pregnancy rate
KW - Progesterone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077148385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.009
M3 - Review article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 31864902
AN - SCOPUS:85077148385
SN - 1472-6483
VL - 40
SP - 143
EP - 150
JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
IS - 1
ER -