Skip to content

Should we sample a time series more frequently? Decision support via multirate spectrum estimation (with discussion).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Guy Nason
  • Ben J Powell
  • Duncan Elliott
  • Paul Smith
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-407
Number of pages55
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A
Volume180
Issue number2
Early online date18 Dec 2016
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Apr 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 18 Dec 2016
DatePublished (current) - Feb 2017

Abstract

Suppose we have a historical time series with samples taken at a slow rate, e.g. quarterly. This article proposes a new method to answer the question: is it worth sampling the series at a faster rate, e.g. monthly? Our contention is that classical time series methods are designed to analyse a series at a single and given sampling rate with the consequence that analysts are not often encouraged to think carefully about what an appropriate sampling rate might be. To answer the sampling rate question we propose a novel Bayesian method that incorporates the historical series, cost information and small amounts of pilot data sampled at the faster rate. The heart of our method is a new Bayesian spectral estimation technique that is capable of coherently using data sampled at multiple rates and is demonstrated to have superior practical performance compared to alternatives. Additionally, we introduce a method for hindcasting historical data at the faster rate. A freeware R package, regspec, is available that implements our methods. We illustrate our work using official statistics time series including the United Kingdom consumer price index and counts of United Kingdom residents travelling abroad, but our methods are general and apply to any situation where time series data are collected.

    Research areas

  • aliasing, Bayesian statistics, Multirate, spectrum estimation, time series

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rssa.12210/abstract. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 547 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups