Silence is golden, but my measures still see—why cheaper-but-noisier outcome measures in large simple trials can be more cost-effective than gold standards

Benjamin Woolf*, Hugo Pedder, Henry Rodriguez-Broadbent, Phil Edwards

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

BW is funded by an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) South West Doctoral Training Partnership (SWDTP) 1 + 3 PhD Studentship Award (ES/P000630/1) and the Wellcome Trust (225790/Z/22/Z). CJR is supported by BHF Senior Basic Science Research fellowship FS/SBSRF/21/31025. The research was supported by the United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council (MC_UU_000011/7 and MC_UU_00002/7). For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.
Original languageEnglish
Article number532
JournalTrials
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silence is golden, but my measures still see—why cheaper-but-noisier outcome measures in large simple trials can be more cost-effective than gold standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this