Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: The rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker

Rosemary Hiscock*, Linda Bauld, Amanda Amos, Stephen Platt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

128 Citations (Scopus)


Background Since 2000 various tobacco control measures have been implemented in the UK. Changes in the smoking status of low and high socioeconomic status (SES) groups in England during this period (200108) are explored.MethodsSecondary analysis of the Health Survey for England general population samples was undertaken. Over 88 000 adults, age 16 or over, living in England were included. Smoking status (current, ex or never) was reported. SES was assessed through a count of seven possible indicators of disadvantage: National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NSSEC), neighbourhood index of multiple deprivation, lone parenting, car availability, housing tenure, income and unemployment.ResultsSmoking rates were four times higher among the most disadvantaged [60.7 (95 CI: 58.263.3)] than the most affluent [15.3 (95 CI: 14.815.8)]. Smoking prevalence declined between 2001 and 2008 except among the multiply disadvantaged. This trend appeared to be due to an increase in never smoking rather than an increase in quitting. Disadvantage declined among non-smokers but not smokers.ConclusionsIn general never smoking and affluence increased in England over this period. The disadvantaged, however, did not experience the decline in smoking and smokers missed out from the increase in affluence. Smoking and disadvantage may increasingly coexist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)390-396
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2012


  • smoking
  • socioeconomics factors


Dive into the research topics of 'Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: The rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this