Social Investment After Neoliberalism: Policy Paradigms and Political Platforms

Christopher Deeming, Paul Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)
474 Downloads (Pure)


The concept of the ‘social investment state’ refocuses attention on the productive function of social policy eclipsed for some time by the emphasis on its social protection or compensation roles. Here we distinguish between different social investment strategies, the Nordic ‘heavy’ and the Liberal ‘light’, with particular reference to the inclusive growth approach adopted in Australia. In 2007, social democrats in Australia returned to government with a clear mandate to reject the labour market deregulation and other neoliberal policies of its predecessor, and to tackle entrenched social and economic disadvantage in Australian society. For the last five years, social investment and inclusive growth has been at the centre of the Australian social policy agenda. Against this background, the article examines and critically assesses the (re)turn to ‘social investment’ thinking in Australia during Labor's term in office (2007–13). Analysis focuses not just on what was actually achieved, but also on the constraining role of prevailing economic and political circumstances and on the processes that were used to drive social investment reform. In many ways, the article goes some way to exposing ongoing tensions surrounding the distinctiveness of ‘social investment’ strategies pursued by leftist parties within the (neo)liberal state.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-318
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Social Investment After Neoliberalism: Policy Paradigms and Political Platforms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Future Research Leaders.

    Deeming, C.


    Project: Research

Cite this