Abstract
In British archaeology, there are apparent tensions between macro-level, landscape-wide analyses, and micro-level, site-based approaches. Macro-level analyses are based on techniques and technologies such as aerial photograph transcriptions, LiDAR data and GIS-based mapping, as exemplified in many excellent National Mapping Programme studies and several new large-scale research projects. These studies have proved invaluable in mapping extensive areas of archaeology, and GIS-based data can be interrogated through many forms of spatial analysis. At the same time, developer-funded fieldwork has provided opportunities to excavate and record large areas thus contributing a significant amount of new information to field system studies at a detailed, localised level or micro-scale. This difference between scales is explored through a series of case studies focusing on later prehistoric and Romano-British field systems. Different approaches and methodological, temporal and interpretative scales are examined, and the creative rather than negative aspects of such tensions are explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-32 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Landscapes |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- field systems, Iron Age, Romano-British, temporal and spatial scales
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Some fishy things about scales: macro and micro levels of analysis in the study of later prehistoric and Romano-British field systems.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver