Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

SORA 2.5-Guided BVLOS UAS for Wildlife Conservation in Kenya: Reducing Friction Between Safety and Field Operations

Guy Maalouf*, Thomas Stuart Richardson, David Roy Guerin, Matthew Watson, Ulrik Pagh Schultz Lundquist, Blair R. Costelloe, Elzbieta Pastucha, Saadia Afridi, Edouard George Alain Rolland, Kilian Meier, Jes Hundevadt Jepsen, Thomas van der Sterren, Lucie Laporte-Devylder, Camille Rondeau Saint-Jean, Constanza Andrea Molina Catricheo, Vandita Shukla, Elena Iannino, Jenna Kline, Dat Nguyen Ngoc, William NjorogeKjeld Jensen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Safe Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations are increasingly required for wildlife monitoring and conservation, yet existing regulatory frameworks are rarely tailored to protected areas characterised by low population density and limited infrastructure. This paper presents a field-based use case illustrating how the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) methodology can be applied to conservation-oriented BVLOS missions under Kenyan airspace conditions, including coordination within military-controlled airspace. We evaluate three population-density estimation approaches (qualitative, bottom-up, and top-down) against available ground truth, and compare tabulated and analytical SORA methods for deriving the Ground Risk Class. The work illustrates how SORA 2.5 structures ground and air risk reasoning in a conservation context, while retrospective review identifies limitations in containment, Operational Safety Objectives, and tactical mitigation performance requirements. Field trials involved five concurrent teams and 30 personnel conducting over 260 flights and more than 60 h of UAS activity across the Ol Pejeta Conservancy, providing insights into multi-team coordination under field conditions. Field implementation revealed areas of misalignment between prescribed safety requirements and operational realities, prompting iterative adaptation of workflows and procedures. Observed outcomes included reductions in team size (25–50%) and procedural steps (18%), derived from retrospective comparison of field procedures. A lightweight Uncrewed Traffic Management prototype was also trialled, revealing practical limitations in conservancy environments. Finally, we present a ten-step framework for developing field-ready safety procedures to support risk-informed decision-making in non-standard operational contexts. The findings provide empirically grounded guidance on applying SORA principles to conservation UAS missions, without proposing a new risk framework or generalised operational model.
Original languageEnglish
Article number178
Number of pages53
JournalDrones
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 by the authors.

Keywords

  • drone
  • BVLOS
  • wildlife
  • UTM
  • conservation
  • safety
  • UAS
  • procedures
  • SORA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SORA 2.5-Guided BVLOS UAS for Wildlife Conservation in Kenya: Reducing Friction Between Safety and Field Operations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this