Abstract
This article outlines how a materialist understanding of foreign policy predicated on contrasting sovereignty regimes might be applied to current conflicts between China and the United States and its allies in the South China Sea. A stark divergence between liberal and realist commentary, policy prescriptions, and policy practices has emerged in both China and the United States. We provide a critical overview of the dispute before arguing that these disparities are, at root, symptoms of a material contradiction between the benefits and risks of economic interdependence and territorial expansionism. These symptoms are consequently founded upon a real-world paradox, refracted through fundamentally different modalities of practicing state sovereignty, and will ultimately be resolved politically. An intensification of interstate rivalry is fast becoming the outcome of a period of unprecedented economic interconnectedness, to which these variegated sovereignty regimes are contributing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 249-273 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Eurasian Geography and Economics |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 23 Sep 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Sino-US relations
- China
- South China Sea
- IR / IPE
- Political Economy
- Sovereignty Regimes
- Geography
- Economics
- Uneven development