Stable strontium isotopic heterogeneity in the solar system from double-spike data

B.L.A. Charlier, Ian Parkinson, Kevin W. Burton, Monica Grady, Colin Wilson, Euan Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
296 Downloads (Pure)


Strontium isotopic anomalies in meteorites are important in assessing nucleosynthetic sources to, and measuring the timing of, early solar system processes. However, conventional use of a constant 88Sr/86Sr value in correcting for instrumental mass fractionation during analysis renders measurements ambiguous and removes information on mass-dependent fractionation variations. From double-spike techniques we obtain data for the four stable strontium isotopes free of this ambiguity, and report measurements from a range of meteoritic, lunar and terrestrial materials. The Earth, Moon, basaltic eucrites and feldspars from angrites (differentiated samples) follow a single mass-dependent fractionation line and have a common nucleosynthetic origin in terms of their strontium isotopes. In contrast, bulk rock CI, CV3, CM and CO chondrite samples serve to define another mass-dependent fractionation line, displaced by 94 ± 28 ppm to heavier 84Sr/86Sr and/or 88Sr/86Sr ratios than that for the differentiated samples. Our Sr-isotopic data are consistent with a primary contrast in early solar system composition between an outer zone of primitive, mostly undifferentiated, materials and an inner zone of (almost entirely) differentiated materials that accumulated to form the terrestrial planets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-40
Number of pages6
JournalGeochemical Perspectives Letters
Early online date15 Sep 2017
Publication statusPublished - 2017


  • strontium
  • stable strontium isotopes
  • isotopic fractionation
  • double spike
  • TIMS
  • solar system
  • meteorite
  • nucleosynthetic anomaly

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stable strontium isotopic heterogeneity in the solar system from double-spike data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this