Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers

Carlos Sillero Rejon*, Osama Mahmoud, Ricardo M Tamayo, Alvaro A Clavijo-Alvarez, Sally Adams, Olivia M Maynard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims
To measure how cigarette packaging (standardised packaging and branded packaging) and health warning size affect visual attention and pack preferences among Colombian smokers and non-smokers.

Design
To explore visual attention, we used an eye-tracking experiment where non-smokers, weekly smokers and daily smokers were shown cigarette packs varying in warning size (30%-pictorial on top of the text, 30%-pictorial and text side-by-side, 50%, 70%) and packaging (standardised packaging, branded packaging). We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the impact of warning size, packaging and brand name on preferences to try, taste perceptions and perceptions of harm.

Setting
Eye-tracking laboratory, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Participants
Participants (n = 175) were 18 to 40 years old.

Measurements
For the eye-tracking experiment, our primary outcome measure was the number of fixations toward the health warning compared with the branding. For the DCE, outcome measures were preferences to try, taste perceptions and harm perceptions.

Findings
We observed greater visual attention to warning labels on standardised versus branded packages (F[3,167] = 22.87, P < 0.001) and when warnings were larger (F[9,161] = 147.17, P < 0.001); as warning size increased, the difference in visual attention to warnings between standardised and branded packaging decreased (F[9,161] = 4.44, P < 0.001). Non-smokers visually attended toward the warnings more than smokers, but as warning size increased these differences decreased (F[6,334] = 2.92, P = 0.009). For the DCE, conditional trials showed that increasing the warning size from 30% to 70% reduced preferences to try (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 95% CI = [0.42,0.54], P < 0.001), taste perceptions (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = [0.54,0.68], P < 0.001); and increased harm perceptions (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = [0.76,0.80], P < 0.001). Compared with branded packaging, standardised packaging reduced our DCE outcome measures with ORs ranging from OR = 0.25 (95% CI = [0.17,0.38], P < 0.001) to OR = 0.79 (95% CI = [0.67,0.93], P < 0.001) across two brands. These effects were more pronounced among non-smokers, males and younger participants. Unconditional trials showed similar results.

Conclusions
Standardised cigarette packaging and larger health warnings appear to decrease positive pack perceptions and have the potential to reduce the demand for cigarette products in Colombia.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalAddiction
Early online date9 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
C.S.R. time is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust. Funding for the research came from a University of Bristol GCRF Pump Priming Call (2018–2019) awarded to O.M. entitled ‘Eye‐tracking to evaluate the impact of Colombian tobacco control policies’.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.

Research Groups and Themes

  • HEHP@Bristol

Keywords

  • tobacco
  • packaging
  • warning
  • DCE
  • eye-tracking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this