Statehood and Refugees: Patterns of Integration and Segregation of Refugee Populations in Lebanon from a Comparative Perspective

Filippo Dionigi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

2 Citations (Scopus)
114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scholarly debate has persuasively highlighted the inherent tension between refugees and the modern state. Yet, how do state-refugee relations unfold in practice when considering the historical and social specificity of a single state? Is there a heuristic value in going beyond the premises of a general state-refugee binary and adopt a state-specific approach? These questions are addressed through an analysis based on the modelling of statehood in Lebanon and comparing five cases of refugee-state relations in this country. This method allows explaining the variation in degrees of segregation or integration of refugees and shows that the mode of politicization of refugees is the key factor in understanding this variation. Not all refugees and not all states are the same; the variance of state-refugee relations is best explained from a perspective that considers the historically situated nature of statehood.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-146
Number of pages34
JournalMiddle East Law and Governance
Volume9
Issue number2
Early online date23 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • integration
  • Lebanon
  • refugees
  • segregation
  • statehood

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Statehood and Refugees: Patterns of Integration and Segregation of Refugee Populations in Lebanon from a Comparative Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this