Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: a Mixed-methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer

Carmel M Conefrey, Jenny L Donovan, R.C. Stein, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Andrea Marshall, John Bartlett, D Cameron, A Campbell, J Dunn, H Earl, P Hall, Victoria Harmer, Luke Hughes-Davies, Iain MacPherson, A Makris, A Morgan, Sarah Pinder, C Poole, D Rea, Leila Rooshenas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims
De-escalation trials are challenging and sometimes may fail due to poor recruitment. The OPTIMA prelim randomised controlled trial (RCT) (ISRCTN42400492) randomised patients with early stage breast cancer to chemotherapy versus ‘test-directed’ chemotherapy, with a possible outcome of no chemotherapy which could confer less treatment relative to routine practice. Despite encountering challenges, OPTIMA prelim reached its recruitment target ahead of schedule. This study reports the root-causes of recruitment challenges and strategies employed to successfully overcome them.

Materials and Method
A mixed-methods recruitment intervention (‘QuinteT Recruitment Intervention’, QRI) was employed to investigate the recruitment difficulties and feed-back findings to inform interventions and optimise ongoing recruitment. Quantitative site-level recruitment data, audio-recorded recruitment appointments (n=46), qualitative interviews (n=22) with trialists/recruiting staff (oncologists/nurses) and patient-facing documentation were analysed using descriptive, thematic, and conversation analyses. Findings were triangulated to inform a ‘plan of action’ to optimise recruitment.

Results
Despite best intentions, oncologists’ routine practices complicated recruitment. Discomfort about deviating from the usual practice of recommending chemotherapy according to tumour clinicopathologic features, meant that not all eligible patients were approached. Audio-recorded recruitment appointments revealed how routine practices undermined recruitment. A tendency to justify chemotherapy provision before presenting the RCT, and subtly indicating that chemotherapy would be more/less beneficial undermined equipoise and made it difficult for patients to engage with OPTIMA prelim. To tackle these challenges, individual and group recruiter feedback focussed on communication issues, and vignettes of eligible patients were discussed to address discomforts around approaching patients. ‘Tips’ documents concerning structuring discussions and conveying equipoise were disseminated across sites, alongside revisions to the Patient Information Sheet.

Conclusions
This is the first study illuminating the tension between oncologists’ routine practices and recruitment to de-escalation trials. Although time and resource is required, these challenges can be addressed through specific feedback and training as the trial is underway.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Oncology
Early online date20 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Randomised controlled trials
  • de-escalation trial
  • breast cancer
  • recruitment
  • qualitative research
  • equipoise

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: a Mixed-methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this