Survivorship, Patient Reported Outcome and Satisfaction Following Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty

Michael R. Whitehouse*, Alexander L. Aquilina, Sajal Patel, Stephen J. Eastaugh-Waring, Ashley W. Blom

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resurfacing (RA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are options in the treatment of debilitating hip pathology. 381 patients that had undergone arthroplasty with a BHR RA, ASR RA, metal-on-metal (MOM) THA or ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA were reviewed for satisfaction, function, health and survivorship at a median follow up of 50 months. Significantly lower survivorship for revision and reoperation was observed in the ASR group. The BHR and CoC demonstrated better outcome scores than the ASR (OHS and SAPS) and the BHR better scores than the MoM (OHS and SF12 PCS). In the short to medium term, survivorship and outcomes for the best performing RA (BHR) and THA (CoC) were comparable. There was a non-significant trend towards poorer outcome scores in the MoM THA group. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-848
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • hip
  • treatment outcome
  • survival rate
  • 1ST 230 HIPS
  • SURFACE ARTHROPLASTY
  • UNITED-STATES
  • METAL
  • OSTEOARTHRITIS
  • REPLACEMENT
  • 5-YEAR
  • TRIAL
  • SINGLE
  • DEBRIS

Cite this