Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of McIsaac and Centor score in patients presenting to secondary care with Pharyngitis

Atchchuthan Kanagasabai*, Callum Evans, Hayley E Jones, Alastair D Hay, Sarah Dawson, Jelena Savović, Martha M C Elwenspoek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Centor and McIsaac scores are clinical prediction rules for diagnosing group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection in patients with pharyngitis. Their recommended thresholds vary between guidelines.
Objectives
To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the McIsaac and Centor scores to diagnose GAS pharyngitis and evaluate their impact on antibiotic prescribing at each threshold in patients presenting to secondary care.
Data sources
MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2022.
Study eligibility criteria
Studies of patients presenting with acute pharyngitis to emergency or outpatient clinics that estimated the accuracy of McIsaac or Centor scores against throat cultures and/or rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) as reference standards.
Tests
Centor or McIsaac score
Reference standard
Throat cultures and/or RADT
Assessment of risk of bias
QUADAS-2

Methods of data synthesis
The sensitivities and specificities of the McIsaac and Centor scores were pooled at each threshold using bivariate random effects meta-analysis.
Results
Fourteen studies were included (8 McIsaac and 6 Centor score). Eight studies had unclear and six had a high risk of bias. The McIsaac score had higher estimated sensitivity and lower specificity relative to Centor scores at equivalent thresholds, but with wide and overlapping confidence regions. Using either score as a triage to RADT to decide antibiotic treatment would reduce antibiotic prescription to non-GAS pharyngitis patients relative to RADT test for everyone, but also reduce antibiotic prescription to GAS patients.
Conclusion
Centor and McIsaac scores are equally ineffective at triaging patients who need antibiotics presenting with pharyngitis at hospitals. At high thresholds, too many true positive cases are missed, while at low thresholds, too many false positives are treated, leading to the over-prescription of antibiotics. The former may be compensated by adequate safety netting by clinicians, ensuring that patients can seek help if symptoms worsen.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-452
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of McIsaac and Centor score in patients presenting to secondary care with Pharyngitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this