Abstract
Mixed-effects models can be used to examine the association between a categorical moderator and the magnitude of the effect size. Two approaches are available to estimate the residual between-studies variance, s 2res —namely, separate estimation within each category of the moderator versus pooled estimation across all categories. We examine, by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, both approaches for s 2res estimation in combination with two methods, the Wald-type X 2 and F tests, to test the statistical significance of the moderator. Results suggest that the F test using a pooled estimate of s 2res across categories is the best option in most conditions, although the F test using separate estimates of s 2res is preferable if the residual heterogeneity variances are heteroscedastic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Education |
| Early online date | 30 Jan 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- mixed-effects model
- residual between-studies variance
- subgroup analyses
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing Categorical Moderators in Mixed-Effects Meta-analysis in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver