'Testing Conspiracy to Defraud's Resilience'

Jennifer Collins*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

395 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article reappraises the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud in the light of several new developments—the Court of Appeal’s decisions in Barton and Bermingham, and changes in fraud brought about by the current Covid-19 crisis. Defences of the conspiracy to defraud offence given in Barton and Bermingham are too scant of the issue of legal certainty. Detailed engagement with art.7 of the ECHR and its jurisprudence is needed, and this is what this article provides. A further question requires advanced analysis in the light of ongoing legal certainty concerns. What guidance should be given on bringing prosecutions for conspiracy to defraud in a rapidly changing fraud landscape, intensified by a global pandemic?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)902-920
Number of pages19
JournalCriminal Law Review
Volume11
Publication statusPublished - 6 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Conspiracy to defraud
  • Coronavirus
  • Legal certainty
  • No punishment without law
  • Pandemics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Testing Conspiracy to Defraud's Resilience''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this