‘Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures’: Reply to the comments of Chilton, Covey, Jones-Lee, Loomes, Pidgeon and Spencer

Philip J Thomas; Geoffrey J Vaughan

doi:10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003

‘Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures’: Reply to the comments of Chilton, Covey, Jones-Lee, Loomes, Pidgeon and Spencer

Philip J Thomas, Geoffrey J Vaughan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal) › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

280 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

[no abstract]

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	299–306
Number of pages	8
Journal	Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Volume	93
Early online date	27 Nov 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003
Publication status	Published - Jan 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003

Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Elsevier at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582014001797 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Final published version, 494 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{2f7a6e3be3724a70bd961b63182bbe93,

title = "{\textquoteleft}Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures{\textquoteright}: Reply to the comments of Chilton, Covey, Jones-Lee, Loomes, Pidgeon and Spencer",

abstract = "[no abstract]",

author = "Thomas, {Philip J} and Vaughan, {Geoffrey J}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

pages = "299–306",

journal = "Process Safety and Environmental Protection",

issn = "0957-5820",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

‘Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures’: Reply to the comments of Chilton, Covey, Jones-Lee, Loomes, Pidgeon and Spencer. / Thomas, Philip J; Vaughan, Geoffrey J.
In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 93, 01.2015, p. 299–306.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal) › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Testing the validity of the “value of a prevented fatality” (VPF) used to assess UK safety measures’

T2 - Reply to the comments of Chilton, Covey, Jones-Lee, Loomes, Pidgeon and Spencer

AU - Thomas, Philip J

AU - Vaughan, Geoffrey J

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - [no abstract]

AB - [no abstract]

U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2014.11.003

M3 - Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

SN - 0957-5820

VL - 93

SP - 299

EP - 306

JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

ER -