This study investigates the logics or values that shape the social and environmental reporting (SER) and SER assurance (SERA) process. The influence of logics is observed through a study of the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the materiality concept by accounting and non-accounting assurors and their assurance statements. We gathered qualitative data from interviews with both accounting and non-accounting assurors. We analysed the interplay between old and new logics that are shaping materiality as a reporting concept in SER. SER is a rich field in which to study the dynamics of change because it is a voluntary, unregulated, qualitative reporting arena. It has a broad, stakeholder audience, where accounting and non-accounting organisations are in competition. There are three key findings. First, the introduction of a new, stakeholder logic has significantly changed the meaning and role of materiality. Second, a more versatile, performative, social understanding of materiality was portrayed by assurors, with a forward-looking rather than a historic focus. Third, competing logics have encouraged different beliefs about materiality, and practices, to develop. This influenced the way assurors theorised the concept and interpreted outcomes. A patchwork of localised understandings of materiality is developing. Policy implications both in SERA and also in financial audit are explored.
|Number of pages||18|
|Journal||British Accounting Review|
|Early online date||15 Nov 2014|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Mar 2015|
- AF Accountability Sustainability and Governance
- Institutional logics
- Social and environmental reporting assurance (SERA)
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Professor Michael J Jones
- School of Accounting and Finance - Emeritus Professor
Person: Honorary and Visiting Academic