The allocation of organs: The need for fairness and transparency

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Whilst every opportunity must be taken to increase organ donation within accepted legal, moral and ethical guidelines, it is equally important that no effort is spared to avoid wastage. This process demands the highest standards, if public and professional confidence is to be maintained. Donated organs should be placed where they are most likely to improve quality of life and to be of lasting benefit. This chapter considers the evolution of the organ allocation system in the United Kingdom (UK). As it has evolved, the system has incorporated many of the conflicts which can arise. These include (but are by no means limited to) conflicts over biological incompatibility between a donor and a recipient, legal issues, ethical principles, competing claims between individuals and between individuals and society, the objectives of healthcare regulators, and financial resources. The system of donation for thoracic organs and livers is not discussed in this chapter. Nor is there examination of the criteria for gaining access to the transplant list, an area which itself raises many issues worthy of consideration. This chapter will instead focus on the allocation of kidneys to those on kidney transplant lists. There are certain background conditions against which any analysis of the organ allocation system must take place. These are: 1. biological compatibility is important to avoid immediate failure; and 2. demand for organs currently outstrips available supply of organs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOrgan Shortage: Ethics, Law and Pragmatism
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages122-135
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9780511973536, 9780521198998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Structured keywords

  • LAW Centre for Health Law and Society

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The allocation of organs: The need for fairness and transparency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this