Abstract
Cognitive frameworks provide important means for uniting concepts of specificity, cognition, and dynamic change in development. Two points are challenged by evidence from special populations: (1) that boundary constraints such as Residual Normality and a cognitive “endstate” compromise the use of cognitive models; and (2) the developmental process itself automatically rejects either Residual Normality or residual deviance from typical development.
| Translated title of the contribution | The beauty of models for developmental disorders (commentary) |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 750-752 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2002 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Developmental (Psychological Science)