Skip to content

The birth experience and subsequent maternal caregiving attitudes and behavior: a birth cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-620
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Women's Mental Health
Early online date23 Oct 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 15 Oct 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 23 Oct 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Oct 2019


Optimal maternal caregiving is critical for children’s healthy development, yet quality of maternal caregiving may be influenced by a negative birth experience. We examined whether the birth experience was associated with maternal caregiving attitudes and behavior throughout the first year. We conducted secondary analysis of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children birth cohort on perinatal data. The birth experience was assessed using self-report data on level of support in labor. Maternal caregiving variables were self-report maternal attitudes at one and eight postnatal months, and observed maternal behavior at 12 postnatal months. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for critical covariates at one (N = 4389), eight (N = 4580), and 12 (N = 842) postnatal months. Feeling supported in labor was associated with a report of “immediately falling in love” with one’s baby after birth, surveyed at 1 month (adjusted OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.20–1.65]), and with more positive parenting scores at 8 months (adjusted OR 1.56 [95% CI 1.36–1.79]), but not with more positive observed maternal behavior at 12 months. Additional risk factors were identified. Our findings suggest that we may be able to modify the risk of poor postnatal maternal caregiving by supporting women in labor and facilitating a positive birth experience.

    Research areas

  • ALSPAC, Birth experience, Maternal attitude, Maternal behavior, Parenting, Systematic review

    Structured keywords


Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Springer at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 243 KB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups