The British general election of 2010: a three-party contest - or three two-party contests?

Ron Johnston*, Charles Pattie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geography is an inherent component of the UK electoral system, and several separate geographies interact in the translation of votes into seats. Many argue that Great Britain now has a three-party system, but we show that it is dominated by three separate two-party systems because of the geographies of support for the three largest parties. At recent elections, the translation of votes into seats has substantially favoured the Labour Party. At the 2010 election, however, that advantage had largely disappeared, in both the constituencies where its main opponent was the Conservative Party candidate and those where it was the Liberal Democrat candidate. Removal of that pro-Labour bias in the former case resulted from the Conservatives' largely successful target seats campaign.

Translated title of the contributionThe British general election of 2010: a three-party contest or three two-party contests?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalGeographical Journal
Volume177
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Keywords

  • elections
  • bias
  • contest types
  • target seats
  • campaigns
  • BOUNDARY COMMISSIONS

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The British general election of 2010: a three-party contest - or three two-party contests?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this